Quite literally, from the cold: it seemed like St Petersburg fired up its district heating (central heating for the whole city, that is) halfway through my week there, making the first few days pretty chilly, the last few quite bearable. What I saw of the city is impressive but selectively welcoming.
First impression: the scale of the thing. The city is a big, sprawling collection of blocks, each of which is much larger than we usually expect in dense, packed European cities. The second impression is that of width: the main roads are three-plus-three lane avenues, with wide sidewalks, often in straight lines. They are made for parades. And the buildings in the centre are big palaces or apartment blocks; not very high, but easily a couple of hundred metres long. Fourth impression: the right angles between the buildings and the road level: the entrances are almost hidden, often diminutive cutouts in the facade, or single-storey arches leading to the internal courtyards. No wide entrances, no steps leading up to a first-floor portico. It seemed as if the architecture was planned to underline the impermeable line between the people on the street level, and those on the inside of the palaces. Nowhere did I get this feeling more strongly than outside the Hermitage, where the scale of the piazza drowns out the individual, and reinforces the grandeur of the State.
This “inside/outside” distinction was underlined by our modest mini-hotel: a steel door on the side of the building with a minuscule sign next to a buzzer, leading to a pretty shabby stairwell (occasionally occupied by a chain-smoking gang of youths, indifferent to the patrons passing by); then, on the first floor, another steel door and intercom, leading to the exact opposite of the stairwell: a clean, well-lit corridor, with a friendly concierge.
The Russians themselves, however, were the antithesis of the city: warm, friendly, eager to chat, if occasionally frustrated by the language barrier – in many cases there's enough English to talk about work, but not to exchange jokes. (Having said that, one of my most memorable conversations was with [José and] a complete stranger in a bar, who spoke as much English as I do Russian: the exquisite joy of the half-drunken search for gestures and common word-roots that only the small hours give rise to.)
I was particularly impressed with some of the younger generation of designers (“younger”, from where I'm looking at things, is the twenty-somethings and thirty-somethings). There seems to be no shortage of talented graduates (I think most from the Moscow schools?) who are taking typography very seriously. At least a couple of them stood out: I had met Irina Smirnova and Alexandra Korolkova in Helsinki, where they showed me accomplished typeface designs. So far, so good. Irina is now working at Art Lebedev's studio; Alexandra pulled a rabbit out of her hat: in the three years since Helsinki, she graduated from university, started teaching, and – get this – extended her final project into a proper book: Живая типографика. I can't understand a single sentence, but I can figure out the book: the topics, the chapter headings, the diagrams, the manner with which images have been shot, all make the approach are all evident. I didn't see many introductory texts by Russian authors on the modest book stall, so this must be a welcome addition to Russian designers' libraries. Some people whose names I recognize and respect have added their bits on the back cover, so it seems that others share the good vibe.
Oh, and – for reasons undeserved – I got a medal! It's a proper chunk of bronze, with Peter the Great on one side, and the extended version of the conference logo on the other side. We'll get it in the University Bulletin, but I don't think it will be enough for me to get a raise.


